Home > Market Commentary > The US Economy Lost 2.7 Million Jobs in January

The US Economy Lost 2.7 Million Jobs in January

Markets were elated over the higher-than-expected gain in Total Nonfarm Payrolls in January. That large gain, of course, was only discernible after a “seasonal adjustment,” made at the discretion of government statisticians. Below I’ve charted Total Nonfarm Payrolls since 2005 without any seasonal adjustments (NSA):

The graph shows that there are predictable declines in total employment in July and January, due to abrupt changes in summer and holiday jobs. These abrupt changes are easier to see if we look at the change in Nonfarm Payrolls NSA:

Minus the discretionary “seasonal adjustment,” the economy actually shed 2.7 million jobs in January. The seasonally-adjusted (SA) Nonfarm Payrolls number does not measure the actual number of jobs created or destroyed. The SA number instead measures what total employment WOULD BE if it weren’t July or January. And it’s important to note that much of the seasonal adjustment process occurs based on the discretion of government statisticians. Who couldn’t possibly be under pressure to produce evidence of a stronger economy during a presidential election year. No way.

To help reconcile the large difference between the seasonally-adjusted and non-adjusted data, I also graphed Total Tax Collections and Income Tax Collections by the States:

If the economy were adding jobs and more people were working again . . . shouldn’t the states be collecting MORE total taxes, especially income taxes? Maybe we should start seasonally adjusting more data, so these annoying divergences — that make absolutely no sense — would be harder to document. Further notice in the above graph how Total State Income Taxes are falling faster than Total Taxes, which suggests FEWER people are working and paying Income Taxes, not more.

“Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls — in the blue corner, we have the non-seasonally adjusted data. In the red corner, we have the discretion of government statisticians. The referee has explained the rules to each fighter.”

But my question is: Does the “audience” that trades and invests based on the discretion of government statisticians understand the rules? Do they even pay attention to the rules? And if they could only choose one, would they choose a.) accurate data or b.) the increasingly-addictive rush of dopamine associated with another triple-digit gain in the Dow?

Advertisements
Categories: Market Commentary
  1. June 9, 2014 at 5:29 pm

    This is my first time visit at here and i am in fact impressed to read everthing at
    one place.

  2. September 24, 2014 at 5:19 am

    Fantastic blog! Do you have any tips and hints for aspiring writers?
    I’m planning to start my own website soon but I’m a little lost
    on everything. Would you advise starting with a free platform like WordPress or go for a
    paid option? There are so many choices out there that I’m completely confused ..
    Any ideas? Cheers!

  3. October 8, 2014 at 11:50 pm

    Unquestionably consider that that yyou said.
    Your favorite reason appeared to be on the net the easiest hing to have in mind of.
    I say to you, I definitely get annoyed while other folks consider worries tthat they plainly do not know about.
    You managed to hit tthe nail upon the top aand also outlined
    out the whole thing without havging side-effects , other folks can take a signal.

    Will likely be again to gett more. Thank you

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: